What is Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)?
Human-in-the-loop (HITL) is a way to run an AI system so that a person can review, override or reverse its output.
What the term means
The AI system makes a proposal, for example a decision or a flag. A person stays in the process and can accept it, change it or reject it. The EU AI Act describes this ability in Article 14(4). The person can decide not to use the system, or can disregard, override or reverse its output. The Act calls this human oversight. It does not use the term HITL.
How EASA uses the term
EASA lists human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop and human-in-command as ways to oversee an AI-based system. Its AI concept paper does not define them. It tells the applicant to state the definitions it uses. A source that says “HITL means X” is therefore giving its own definition.
EASA also describes levels of AI. At Level 1, AI enhances human capabilities. At Level 2, AI and humans work as a team, and the AI can take decisions automatically under human oversight.
What the AI Act asks of the person
For high-risk AI systems, Article 14(4) says the system must let the person do these things:
- Be aware of automation bias, which is the tendency to rely too much on the output of the system.
- Disregard, override or reverse the output.
- Interrupt the system with a “stop” button or a similar procedure. The system then comes to a safe state.
Airfield inspection
ICAO Annex 14 requires the movement area to be inspected every day. The number of inspections depends on the reference code number. EASA AMC1 ADR.OPS.B.015 says the operator should have a monitoring and inspection programme. The passages that TarmacView read do not mention AI or HITL. They do not say who must review inspection results.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does EASA define human-in-the-loop?
- No. EASA names human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop and human-in-command as ways to oversee an AI-based system. In its AI concept paper (proposed Issue 02) it does not give definitions. It tells the applicant to state the definitions that the applicant uses.
- Does the EU AI Act use the term human-in-the-loop?
- No. Article 14 of the EU AI Act uses the term human oversight. It applies to high-risk AI systems. Those systems must be designed so that natural persons can oversee them while they are in use.
- Do aerodrome rules require a human check of AI inspection results?
- No such rule appears in the sources that TarmacView checked. ICAO Annex 14 and the EASA rules require inspections of the movement area. The passages read do not mention AI or human-in-the-loop.
References
- eu-ai-act-art-14
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), Article 14: Human oversight European Union
- easa-ai-concept-paper-2
- EASA Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper: guidance for Level 1 and 2 machine learning applications, Proposed Issue 02 EASA
- easa-ai-concept-paper-2-news
- EASA publishes Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper Issue 2, Guidance for Level 1 and 2 machine learning applications EASA
- icao-annex-14-vol-1
- ICAO Annex 14 Volume I, Aerodrome Design and Operations, 9th edition ICAO
- easa-ear-aerodromes
- Easy Access Rules for Aerodromes (Regulation (EU) No 139/2014), AMC1 ADR.OPS.B.015 EASA
This is a reference entry. TarmacView provides drone inspection services and doesn't sell the equipment or materials described in this glossary.