ASDA – Accelerate-Stop Distance Available
ASDA (Accelerate-Stop Distance Available) is a declared runway distance in aviation representing the length of runway plus any stopway available for an aircraft...
A stopway is a prepared rectangular area at the end of a runway designed to support an aircraft during an aborted takeoff without causing structural damage. It forms part of the declared distances (ASDA) and is identified by yellow chevron markings per ICAO Annex 14 standards.

A stopway is a defined rectangular area at the end of a runway, prepared or constructed to support an aircraft during an abandoned (rejected) takeoff without inducing structural damage to the aircraft. The term is formally defined by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Annex 14, Volume I, Chapter 1 — Aerodromes. The stopway is not intended for routine takeoff, landing, or taxiing operations; its sole purpose is to provide a deceleration surface in the event that a takeoff is rejected after the aircraft has accelerated past the decision speed V1.
The fundamental difference between a stopway and the runway itself lies in the operational intent. While the runway is engineered for continuous daily use under full takeoff and landing loads, the stopway is designed for occasional emergency use. The stopway extends the Accelerate-Stop Distance Available (ASDA), which is the total distance declared available for an aircraft to accelerate to V1 and, if necessary, abort the takeoff and come to a complete stop. Without a stopway, the ASDA is equal to the TORA. With a stopway, ASDA = TORA + stopway length.
Stopways are primarily found at airports where runway length alone is insufficient to meet the accelerate-stop distance requirements for certain aircraft operations. This situation typically arises at airports constrained by topography, environmental restrictions, or urban development that prevents physical runway extension. By constructing a stopway, airport operators can provide additional safety margin for rejected takeoffs without extending the runway pavement itself — a significantly more expensive and logistically complex undertaking. The design, construction, and maintenance of stopways are governed by the same regulatory frameworks that apply to runways, with some specific exceptions defined by ICAO.

Declared distances are standardized runway length values published for each runway direction at an airport. They represent the portions of runway and associated areas that are officially available for specific phases of aircraft operations. The four declared distances defined by ICAO Annex 14, Chapter 2, Section 2.8 are:
| Declared Distance | Acronym | Definition | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Takeoff Run Available | TORA | The length of runway declared available and suitable for the ground run of an aeroplane taking off | Physical runway length less any sections not suitable for takeoff ground roll |
| Takeoff Distance Available | TODA | The length of the takeoff run available plus the length of the clearway, if provided | TORA + Clearway |
| Accelerate-Stop Distance Available | ASDA | The length of the takeoff run available plus the length of the stopway, if provided | TORA + Stopway |
| Landing Distance Available | LDA | The length of runway declared available and suitable for the ground run of an aeroplane landing | Physical runway length less displaced threshold sections |
The stopway is included exclusively in the ASDA calculation. It does not affect TORA, TODA, or LDA. This distinction is critical for flight planning and performance calculations. For example, at an airport with a 2,500-meter runway and a 300-meter stopway, the declared distances would be published as:
The operational significance of ASDA is most apparent during the takeoff performance calculation. Aircraft takeoff performance is governed by three key distances: the takeoff run (ground roll from brake release to liftoff), the takeoff distance (ground roll plus airborne segment to 35 ft or 50 ft obstacle clearance height), and the accelerate-stop distance (distance required to accelerate to V1, reject the takeoff, and decelerate to a full stop). The accelerate-stop distance must not exceed the published ASDA. A longer ASDA — achieved through a stopway — directly increases the maximum allowable takeoff weight for the aircraft or improves safety margins on rejected takeoffs.
The requirements for declaring and publishing declared distances are specified in ICAO Annex 14, Chapter 2, Section 2.8. The aerodrome operator, in coordination with the appropriate national aviation authority (such as the FAA in the United States or the national civil aviation authority in other ICAO member states), determines the declared distances for each runway direction. These values are then published in the national Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP), the FAA Chart Supplement (formerly Airport/Facility Directory in the U.S.), and on aeronautical charts. NOTAMs are issued whenever there is a change to declared distances due to construction, maintenance, or temporary obstructions.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.7.1 establishes a standard (mandatory requirement) that a stopway shall have the same width as the runway with which it is associated. This is not a recommendation but a binding specification. Runway width varies according to the aerodrome reference code, which is determined by the aircraft approach category and the runway code number. Typical runway widths per ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.1.10 are:
| Code Number | Wingspan < 15m | 15m - 24m | 24m - 36m | 36m - 52m | 52m - 65m | 65m - 80m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18m | 18m | 23m | — | — | — |
| 2 | 23m | 23m | 30m | — | — | — |
| 3 | 30m | 30m | 30m | 30m | 45m | — |
| 4 | — | — | — | 45m | 45m | 45m |
A Code 4F runway (designed for Code F aircraft such as the Airbus A380 or Boeing 747-8) would therefore have a stopway width of 45 meters. The stopway width uniformity with the runway ensures that an aircraft veering laterally during a rejected takeoff remains on the prepared surface.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.7.2 addresses slopes on stopways as a recommended practice. The longitudinal slope of a stopway should comply with the same specifications as the associated runway (Sections 3.1.13 to 3.1.19), with specific exceptions:
The general longitudinal slope limits for the associated runway apply: a maximum of 1% overall for Code 3 and 4 runways, and a maximum of 2% overall for Code 1 and 2 runways. These slope limitations ensure that an aircraft can be safely decelerated during a rejected takeoff without encountering slope-induced loads or directional control difficulties. The exemption for the 0.8% quarter-length restriction recognizes that the stopway is not subject to the same landing and takeoff performance constraints as the primary runway surface.
The transverse slope of a stopway should comply with the same specifications as the associated runway, as defined in ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.1.19. For runways with code letters C, D, E, and F (generally corresponding to aircraft with wingspans exceeding 24 meters), the ideal transverse slope is 1.5%. For code letters A and B (smaller aircraft), the ideal transverse slope is 2%. In all cases, the transverse slope must not be less than 1%, except at runway or taxiway intersections where flatter slopes may be necessary. The purpose of the transverse slope is to ensure rapid drainage of surface water from the stopway, preventing hydroplaning risks during emergency braking.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.7.4 establishes a standard that the surface of a paved stopway shall be constructed or resurfaced to provide surface friction characteristics at or above those of the associated runway. This is a mandatory requirement, not a recommendation. The rationale is straightforward: during a rejected takeoff, the aircraft relies on braking friction to decelerate. If the stopway surface provides less friction than the runway, the stopping distance would increase, potentially exceeding the available ASDA.
The surface should be free of irregularities, cracks, spalling, or raveling that could induce structural damage to the aircraft during an emergency stop. Foreign object debris (FOD) must be controlled through regular sweeping and inspection. Some stopways incorporate grooved or scored surfaces perpendicular to the centerline to enhance drainage and friction characteristics.
ICAO Annex 14 does not prescribe a specific minimum or maximum length for stopways. The length is determined by the operational requirements of the aircraft using the runway and the accelerate-stop distance needed. The stopway length, combined with the TORA, forms the ASDA that is declared and published. Typically, stopway lengths range from 60 meters to 300 meters, depending on the airport’s operational requirements and site constraints. Unlike clearways, which are limited to a maximum of half the TORA length (per ICAO and FAA), stopways have no prescribed maximum length relative to the runway.
Understanding the distinctions between a stopway, a clearway, and a Runway End Safety Area (RESA) is fundamental to airport design and operations. These three features serve entirely different safety functions and are included in different declared distance calculations.
| Feature | Stopway | Clearway | RESA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Emergency stopping area for rejected takeoff | Obstacle-free area for initial climb after takeoff | Reduce damage from overrun or undershoot |
| Aircraft phase | Ground roll (deceleration) | Airborne (climb) | Ground impact (overrun/undershoot) |
| Load-bearing requirement | Yes — must support aircraft weight without structural damage | No — aircraft must be airborne | Graded area, not designed for load-bearing aircraft support |
| Surface | Paved, friction ≥ runway | Not paved (cleared and graded only) | Graded, cleared, stabilized |
| Width | Same as runway | At least 150 m (75 m for Code 1 or 2) | At least twice the runway width |
| Minimum length | Design-specific (no ICAO minimum) | Not exceeding 50% of TORA | 90 m (standard), 240 m (recommended) |
| Included in declared distance | ASDA only | TODA only | Not included in any declared distance |
| Markings | Yellow chevrons pointing toward runway | Not typically marked | Not typically marked |
| Slope | Per runway specifications (with exemptions) | Must not rise above 1.25% (Code 3/4) or 2% (Code 1/2) plane | Graded transitional slopes |
The clearway is defined in ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.6 as a rectangular area beyond the runway end, under airport authority control, free of obstacles, and suitable for aircraft to overfly during the initial climb. The clearway is included in the TODA calculation and extends the takeoff distance available for the airborne segment. The maximum length of a clearway is limited to half the TORA length. The clearway cannot be used for ground roll — aircraft must be airborne before entering this area.
The RESA is defined in ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.5 as a symmetrical area at the end of the runway strip designed to reduce the risk of damage to an aircraft undershooting or overrunning the runway. The minimum RESA length is 90 meters, with a recommended length of 240 meters for runways used by large aircraft. The width must be at least twice the runway width, centered on the extended centerline. RESA is not included in any declared distance calculation and does not factor into aircraft performance computations. Its purpose is purely passive — to provide a graded, obstacle-free area that minimizes damage in the event of an actual overrun or undershoot.
The Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) is sometimes identified as an alternative to stopways or RESA. However, EMAS is distinct from a stopway in both design and function. EMAS uses a bed of crushable cellular concrete or similar material that deforms under the weight of an overrunning aircraft, absorbing kinetic energy and bringing the aircraft to a safe stop. EMAS is typically installed where space constraints prevent constructing a full-length RESA or where soil conditions preclude the load-bearing requirements of a stopway. While a stopway is designed for aircraft to decelerate using their own braking systems on a paved surface, EMAS provides passive deceleration through material deformation.
A blast pad, sometimes confused with a stopway, is a paved area at the end of a runway designed to resist jet blast erosion of the soil. Blast pads are not designed to support aircraft weight during overruns or rejected takeoffs, and they are not included in declared distance calculations. The FAA considers blast pads as non-load-bearing surfaces intended to protect the underlying soil from jet erosion rather than to support aircraft.

The visual identification of a stopway is achieved through specific markings defined by ICAO Annex 14, Section 7.3 — Pre-threshold area marking. These markings consist of yellow chevrons painted on the stopway surface, pointing in the direction of the runway. The chevron marking system is a recommended practice per ICAO.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 7.3.1 specifies: When the surface before a threshold is paved and exceeds 60 meters in length and is not suitable for normal use by aircraft, the entire length before the threshold should be marked with a chevron marking.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 7.3.2 specifies: A chevron marking should point in the direction of the runway and be placed as shown in Figure 7-2.
ICAO Annex 14, Section 7.3.3 specifies: A chevron marking should be of conspicuous colour and contrast with the colour used for runway markings; it should preferably be yellow. It should have an overall width of at least 0.9 metres.
The chevron marking specifications in detail:
The operational significance of these markings cannot be overstated. The yellow chevrons serve as a visual barrier indicating that the surface area is not suitable for takeoff, landing, or taxiing under normal operating conditions. Pilots must not use the stopway for landing roll, takeoff ground roll, or routine taxiing. The stopway may only be used for emergency deceleration during a rejected takeoff.
In addition to surface markings, ICAO Annex 14, Section 5.5.3 provides specifications for stopway edge markers:
The note accompanying Section 5.5.3.2 states that markers consisting of small vertical boards camouflaged on the reverse side, as viewed from the runway, have proved operationally acceptable. This design ensures that when viewed from the runway, the markers are visible and distinguishable from runway edge markers, but when viewed from the opposite direction (the stopway side), they are less visually prominent.
For night operations, ICAO Annex 14, Section 5.3.16 requires stopway lights for a stopway intended for use at night. These lights must be provided and must be clearly distinguishable from runway edge lights to prevent pilots from confusing the stopway with the runway during visual approaches.
The bearing capacity of a stopway is one of its most critical engineering attributes, directly tied to its functional purpose. ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.7.3 establishes a recommended practice: A stopway should be prepared or constructed so as to be capable, in the event of an abandoned take-off, of supporting the aeroplane which the stopway is intended to serve without inducing structural damage to the aeroplane.
The bearing capacity requirement means that the stopway pavement structure must be engineered to withstand the static and dynamic loads imposed by the critical aircraft during a rejected takeoff. During a rejected takeoff at high speed, the aircraft applies significant vertical loads through the landing gear, as well as longitudinal braking forces that induce shear stresses within the pavement structure. The stopway pavement must resist these forces without:
The stopway bearing strength may be reported using the Pavement Classification Number (PCN) system, which is the ICAO-standard method for reporting pavement bearing strength. The PCN is compared to the Aircraft Classification Rating (ACR) to determine whether the pavement can support the aircraft. For unrestricted operations, the ACR should be less than or equal to the PCN. However, it is important to note that the stopway is not required to achieve the same PCN as the runway, since it is only used in emergency conditions rather than for regular operations. The key requirement is that the stopway supports the aircraft without inducing structural damage, not that it supports unlimited repeated loading.
The subgrade beneath the stopway must also meet stability requirements. Poor subgrade conditions can lead to differential settlement, which creates surface irregularities that could cause aircraft damage during a high-speed rejected takeoff. Proper geotechnical investigation, compaction, and drainage are essential during stopway construction. The use of stabilized subgrade layers or geotextile reinforcement may be necessary in areas with weak native soils.
The surface friction characteristics requirement (ICAO Annex 14, Section 3.7.4 — Standard) is closely related to bearing capacity. The stopway surface must provide friction characteristics at or above those of the associated runway. If the runway has been grooved or scored to enhance friction, the stopway should receive similar surface treatment. Friction testing using continuous friction measuring devices (such as the Saab Friction Tester, Griptester, or Mu-Meter) should be conducted periodically to verify compliance.
Comprehensive stopway inspection is an integral component of runway safety management. Inspections must cover surface condition, markings, obstructions, drainage, and lighting systems. The inspection framework follows the same principles established for runway inspections under national regulations such as FAA Part 139 (Certification of Airports) and the general aerodrome maintenance requirements of ICAO Annex 14, Chapter 10.
The stopway surface condition inspection must evaluate:
The stopway must remain clear of objects that could cause damage to an aircraft during an emergency stop:
Proper drainage is critical to stopway functionality:
Per FAA Part 139 and ICAO recommended practices, stopway inspection frequencies follow the runway inspection schedule:
| Inspection Type | Frequency | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Daily | Once per day during operational hours | Visual inspection for FOD, surface condition, marking visibility, obstructions |
| Periodic | Quarterly or as determined by traffic volume | Friction measurement, pavement condition assessment |
| Annual | Once per year | Full condition evaluation, including drainage systems, lighting, marking reflectivity, pavement structural assessment |
| Post-event | After any rejected takeoff or overrun incident | Immediate inspection for damage assessment |
The stopway contributes directly to runway safety by extending the distance available for a rejected takeoff. Rejected takeoffs are among the most safety-critical events in aviation. A rejected takeoff at high speed — particularly above 80 knots — places extreme demands on the aircraft braking system, tire-ground interface, and pilot reaction time. If the available accelerate-stop distance is insufficient, the aircraft will overrun the runway end, potentially with catastrophic consequences.
The relationship between stopway length and runway safety can be quantified through the balanced field length concept. In aircraft performance engineering, the balanced field length is the distance at which the accelerate-stop distance equals the takeoff distance (including the airborne segment to clear a 35-foot or 50-foot obstacle). For runways with limited length, a stopway effectively increases the accelerate-stop distance, shifting the balanced field length calculation and allowing higher takeoff weights or providing greater safety margins.
Overrun events at airports without adequate stopways or RESA have been a significant focus of aviation safety investigations. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) have both issued recommendations regarding runway end safety areas and stopway provision. The installation or extension of stopways has been identified as a cost-effective safety enhancement at airports where full RESA dimensions cannot be achieved due to physical constraints.
The Flight Safety Foundation’s Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) toolkit identifies runway overrun during rejected takeoff as a high-risk event. The availability of an adequate stopway or ASDA directly mitigates this risk. Airlines, airports, and regulators use the ASDA value to ensure that aircraft operating on a given runway have sufficient accelerate-stop distance for all anticipated takeoff weights, runway conditions, and environmental temperatures.
ICAO Annex 14, Volume I — Aerodromes (8th Edition, July 2018, incorporating all amendments up to Amendment 14-A) contains the complete set of international Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) for stopways. The relevant sections are:
| Paragraph | Type | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | Note | The inclusion of detailed specifications for stopways is not intended to imply that a stopway has to be provided. Guidance on the use of stopways is found in Attachment A, Section 2. |
| 3.7.1 | Standard | A stopway shall have the same width as the runway with which it is associated. |
| 3.7.2 | Recommended Practice | Slopes and changes in slope on a stopway, and the transition from a runway to a stopway, should comply with the specifications for the runway, except that the 0.8% limitation for the first and last quarter need not apply, and at the junction the maximum rate of slope change may be 0.3% per 30m for Code 3 or 4. |
| 3.7.3 | Recommended Practice | A stopway should be prepared or constructed to support the aeroplane during an abandoned take-off without inducing structural damage. |
| 3.7.4 | Standard | The surface of a paved stopway shall be constructed to provide surface friction characteristics at or above those of the associated runway. |
Stopway lights shall be provided for a stopway intended for use at night. These lights must be distinguishable from runway edge lights.
Stopway edge markers should be provided when the extent of the stopway is not clearly indicated by its appearance. They shall be sufficiently different from runway edge markers to prevent confusion.
When the surface before a threshold is paved and exceeds 60 meters in length and is not suitable for normal use by aircraft, the entire length should be marked with yellow chevrons pointing toward the runway, with each chevron stripe at least 0.9 meters wide.
The general maintenance requirements of Chapter 10 apply to stopways. Pavements must be maintained in a condition not less than when constructed (Section 10.2). Contaminants must be removed (Section 10.3). Visual aids must be maintained (Section 10.5).
The maintenance of a stopway follows the same principles as runway pavement maintenance, with specific emphasis on friction characteristics and structural integrity. The key maintenance activities are:
All inspection findings, maintenance actions, friction measurement results, and bearing capacity assessments should be documented and maintained as part of the aerodrome’s safety management system records. This documentation supports regulatory compliance demonstrations and provides trend data for predictive maintenance planning.
Failure to maintain a stopway to ICAO Annex 14 standards can result in the stopway being declassified — meaning it can no longer be counted in the ASDA calculation. If this occurs, the declared distances must be revised and published via NOTAM, and the ASDA will decrease to equal the TORA. This reduction in declared distances can significantly impact aircraft operations, potentially reducing maximum takeoff weights or restricting certain aircraft types from using the runway.
The stopway is a specialized aviation infrastructure element that serves a single critical function: providing a safe deceleration surface for aircraft during rejected takeoffs. As part of the declared distances system, the stopway directly extends the Accelerate-Stop Distance Available (ASDA), enabling airports to accommodate heavier aircraft operations and providing essential safety margins for one of the most demanding flight maneuvers. The regulatory framework established by ICAO Annex 14 — governing stopway width, slope, bearing capacity, markings, and lighting — ensures that stopways meet the rigorous performance standards required for their emergency role. Proper inspection, maintenance, and record keeping are essential to preserve stopway functionality and compliance. For airport operators, aerodrome certification authorities, and flight operations planners, understanding stopway specifications and limitations is fundamental to runway safety management.
For further information, consult ICAO Annex 14, Volume I — Aerodromes (latest edition), FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5300-13B — Airport Design, and the relevant national civil aviation authority regulations. Periodic review of declared distances and stopway condition as part of the aerodrome’s safety management system is recommended.
Ensure your airport meets ICAO and FAA standards for stopway design, maintenance, and inspection. Our experts provide comprehensive runway safety assessments to protect aircraft and passengers.
ASDA (Accelerate-Stop Distance Available) is a declared runway distance in aviation representing the length of runway plus any stopway available for an aircraft...
A clearway is a defined, rectangular area beyond the runway end, free of obstacles and under airport authority control. It extends the airborne segment of takeo...
The runway end, or extremity of runway, is a critical reference point marking the termination of the usable runway surface for aircraft operations. It plays a v...