"What is the difference between a 2D and 3D approach path in aviation?"

"A 2D approach path provides only lateral guidance, meaning the aircraft is aligned horizontally with the runway or approach course, but the vertical descent profile is managed by the pilot. A 3D approach path provides both lateral and vertical guidance, allowing the aircraft to follow a precise glide path to the runway, typically using systems like ILS, GBAS, or GNSS-based vertical navigation."

"Which navigation aids are used to define 3D approach paths?"

"3D approach paths use navigation aids that provide both lateral and vertical guidance. Common examples include the Instrument Landing System (ILS), Ground-Based Augmentation System (GBAS), Microwave Landing System (MLS), and satellite-based navigation with approaches like LPV or LNAV/VNAV, which use GNSS and augmentation systems such as WAAS or SBAS."

"How are approach path minima determined?"

"Minima for an approach path are published limits (such as Decision Altitude/Height or Minimum Descent Altitude/Height) at which the pilot must decide whether to continue the approach or execute a missed approach. These are based on obstacle clearance requirements, approach type, and the capabilities of navigation aids, as defined by international standards from ICAO and FAA."

"Why are 3D approach paths important for aviation safety?"

"3D approach paths reduce pilot workload, minimize the risk of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), and provide stabilized descents, especially in poor visibility. They are critical in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and at airports with challenging terrain or limited visual cues."

"What are the typical segments of a standard instrument approach procedure?"

"A standard instrument approach procedure consists of the arrival segment, initial approach segment, intermediate approach segment, final approach segment, and missed approach segment. Each serves a specific purpose, from transitioning the aircraft from enroute airspace to lining up with the runway and providing a safe escape in case a landing cannot be completed."

Approach Path

The approach path in aviation is the engineered three-dimensional route an aircraft follows during approach to landing, providing both lateral and vertical guidance, usually relying on navigation aids such as ILS, GNSS, and advanced avionics for precision and safety.

Aviation Navigation Instrument Approach Flight Operations

Approach Path – Three-Dimensional Flight Path Followed During Approach to Landing (Aviation Operations)

Definition

An approach path in aviation is the three-dimensional (3D) flight trajectory that an aircraft follows during the approach phase to landing. This path is meticulously defined both laterally (side-to-side, or horizontally) and vertically (altitude), ensuring the aircraft remains aligned with the intended runway centerline and descends along a pre-determined glide path or vertical profile. The 3D approach path is essential for instrument flight operations, particularly under conditions where pilots cannot rely on visual cues and must depend on avionics and ground or satellite-based navigation aids to guarantee a safe, stable approach and landing (ICAO PANS-OPS Doc 8168 ).

Key Features:

Lateral Guidance: Keeps the aircraft aligned with the runway or published approach course, using aids such as ILS localizers, VORs, GNSS, or MLS azimuth signals.
Vertical Guidance: Ensures descent along a defined glide path (typically 3°), using systems like ILS glide slope, barometric VNAV, MLS elevation data, or GNSS-derived profiles.
Operational Context: Used for both instrument and visual approaches, but is fundamental for instrument approaches in low-visibility or complex environments.

2D vs. 3D Approach Path: Summary Table

Feature	2D Approach Path	3D Approach Path
Lateral Guidance	Yes	Yes
Vertical Guidance	No (pilot managed)	Yes (electronic or computed glide path)
Typical Navigation	VOR, NDB, LOC	ILS, GBAS, GNSS (LPV, LNAV/VNAV), MLS
Examples	VOR Approach	ILS, LPV, RNP AR Approach

Historical Evolution of Approach Path Guidance

NDB (Non-Directional Beacon): Provided the first radio-based lateral guidance, but lacked vertical information; pilots relied on charts and visual cues.
VOR (VHF Omnidirectional Range): Improved lateral accuracy, still required pilot-managed descent (Centennial of Flight ).

Precision Approaches (ILS)

ILS (Instrument Landing System): Introduced full lateral (localizer) and vertical (glide slope) guidance, enabling precision approaches in low visibility (Wikipedia - ILS ). Enabled autoland capabilities for the first time.

Advanced Systems (MLS, GNSS, PBN)

MLS (Microwave Landing System): Offered digital lateral and vertical guidance with flexible approach paths, but saw limited adoption.
GNSS and Augmentation: Satellite navigation and augmentation (WAAS, GBAS, SBAS) enabled flexible, highly accurate 3D approaches at more airports, including those lacking traditional ground aids.
PBN/RNP: ICAO’s Performance-Based Navigation framework supports customizable, precise 3D approach paths, even in challenging terrain or airspace (ICAO PBN ).

Era	Key Technology	Lateral Guidance	Vertical Guidance	Notes
1920s-1940s	NDB, Visual	Yes	No	Early navigation, high workload
1940s-1970s	VOR, DME	Yes	No	Improved accuracy
1930s-now	ILS	Yes	Yes	Precision, global standard
1970s-2000s	MLS	Yes	Yes	Digital, flexible, limited use
1990s-now	GNSS, PBN, RNP	Yes	Yes (APV, LPV)	Satellite-based, customizable

2D vs. 3D Approaches: Regulatory and Technical Classifications

ICAO and FAA Definitions

ICAO:

2D Approach: Lateral guidance only (VOR, NDB, LOC). Descent managed by pilot using step-down fixes.
3D Approach: Both lateral and vertical guidance (ILS, MLS, GNSS-based with VNAV). Aircraft descends on a defined geometric path (ICAO Doc 8168 ).

FAA:

Precision Approach (PA): Full lateral and vertical guidance (ILS, GBAS, MLS).
Non-Precision Approach (NPA): Lateral guidance only (VOR, NDB, LOC).
Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV): Satellite/barometric vertical guidance, not meeting all PA standards (e.g., LPV, LNAV/VNAV).

Classification	2D Approach	3D Approach (Type A)	3D Approach (Type B)
ICAO	VOR, NDB, LOC	LPV, LNAV/VNAV	ILS, MLS, GBAS CAT I-III
FAA	NPA	APV	PA
Vertical Guide	No	Yes (not full PA)	Yes (full PA)
Minimums	MDH ≥ 75m	DH ≥ 75m	DH < 75m

Anatomy of a 3D Approach Path

Approach Segments

Arrival Segment: Transition from enroute to approach environment, often via STAR.
Initial Approach Segment: Aligns aircraft for approach, allows configuration for descent.
Intermediate Segment: Establishes aircraft on final approach course and configuration.
Final Approach Segment: From FAF to runway or missed approach point; 3D guidance ensures stabilized descent.
Missed Approach Segment: Safe path to climb out if landing cannot be completed.

Guidance Systems

System	Lateral Guidance	Vertical Guidance	Example Approaches
ILS	Localizer	Glide Slope	ILS CAT I/II/III
MLS	Azimuth	Elevation	MLS Approach
GBAS	GNSS + VDB	GNSS + VDB	GBAS CAT I-III
GNSS (APV)	RNAV (GNSS)	VNAV (Baro/SBAS)	LPV, LNAV/VNAV
VOR/NDB	VOR/NDB	None	Non-Precision

Decision Points and Minima

Decision Altitude/Height (DA/DH): Minimum at which pilot must have visual reference to land or execute missed approach. DA is above mean sea level; DH is above runway threshold.
Minimum Descent Altitude/Height (MDA/MDH): For 2D approaches, the lowest allowed descent without visual reference; pilot levels off until either visual cues or missed approach (Boldmethod ).

Technical Principles of 3D Trajectory Planning and Control

Modern flight management systems and autopilots use sophisticated algorithms to compute, monitor, and adjust the 3D approach path, ensuring smooth transitions between segments and navigation sources. Key technical aspects include:

Path Redefinition Algorithms: Continuously update the aircraft’s predicted trajectory based on active navigation aids, wind, and aircraft performance.
Autopilot Transition and Smoothing: Manage changes between navigation sources (e.g., switching from RNAV to ILS) and approach segments, maintaining stable flight.
Energy Management and Error Correction: Use speed brakes, thrust, and pitch adjustments to maintain the correct descent profile, correcting for errors due to wind, temperature, or navigation inaccuracies.

Real-World Applications and Use Cases

Precision Approaches

ILS, GBAS, MLS: Enable landings in poor visibility (down to zero/low RVR in CAT III), reduce pilot workload, and improve safety.
Performance-Based Navigation (PBN): Allow for flexible, efficient routes even in complex or terrain-challenged environments (ICAO PBN ).

Satellite-Based Approaches

RNP, GNSS Approaches: Enable 3D approaches at airports lacking traditional ground aids, improving global access, especially for smaller airfields.

Emergency and Special Scenarios

Engine-out Approaches: Require precise path planning to ensure obstacle clearance and safe landing.
Noise Abatement/Environmental: Curved and segmented 3D paths reduce noise over populated areas.

Comparison Table: Approach Types & Guidance Dimensions

Approach Type	Lateral Guidance	Vertical Guidance	Navigation Aid(s)	Example
Non-Precision (2D)	Yes	No	VOR, NDB, LOC	VOR/DME
APV (3D, not full PA)	Yes	Yes (not PA)	GNSS (LPV, LNAV/VNAV)	LPV
Precision (PA, 3D)	Yes	Yes (full PA)	ILS, GBAS, MLS	ILS CAT II

ILS (Instrument Landing System): Ground-based system providing precise lateral and vertical guidance for landing.
Localizer (LOC): ILS component providing lateral alignment to runway.
Glide Slope (GS): ILS component providing vertical descent path.
VNAV (Vertical Navigation): Avionics function managing vertical flight profile.
PBN (Performance-Based Navigation): ICAO framework for flexible, accurate navigation using GNSS.
RNP (Required Navigation Performance): PBN specification defining accuracy and integrity for approach paths.
LPV (Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance): GNSS-based approach with precision-like minima.
DA/DH (Decision Altitude/Height): Published minimum for approach continuation decision.
MDA/MDH (Minimum Descent Altitude/Height): Lowest altitude for non-precision approaches.

References and Further Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a 2D and 3D approach path in aviation?: A 2D approach path provides only lateral guidance, meaning the aircraft is aligned horizontally with the runway or approach course, but the vertical descent profile is managed by the pilot. A 3D approach path provides both lateral and vertical guidance, allowing the aircraft to follow a precise glide path to the runway, typically using systems like ILS, GBAS, or GNSS-based vertical navigation.
Which navigation aids are used to define 3D approach paths?: 3D approach paths use navigation aids that provide both lateral and vertical guidance. Common examples include the Instrument Landing System (ILS), Ground-Based Augmentation System (GBAS), Microwave Landing System (MLS), and satellite-based navigation with approaches like LPV or LNAV/VNAV, which use GNSS and augmentation systems such as WAAS or SBAS.
How are approach path minima determined?: Minima for an approach path are published limits (such as Decision Altitude/Height or Minimum Descent Altitude/Height) at which the pilot must decide whether to continue the approach or execute a missed approach. These are based on obstacle clearance requirements, approach type, and the capabilities of navigation aids, as defined by international standards from ICAO and FAA.
Why are 3D approach paths important for aviation safety?: 3D approach paths reduce pilot workload, minimize the risk of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), and provide stabilized descents, especially in poor visibility. They are critical in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and at airports with challenging terrain or limited visual cues.
What are the typical segments of a standard instrument approach procedure?: A standard instrument approach procedure consists of the arrival segment, initial approach segment, intermediate approach segment, final approach segment, and missed approach segment. Each serves a specific purpose, from transitioning the aircraft from enroute airspace to lining up with the runway and providing a safe escape in case a landing cannot be completed.

Enhance your flight operations knowledge

Mastering approach paths is crucial for aviation safety and efficiency. Explore our resources for the latest in instrument approach procedures and technology.

Learn more

Flight Path

A flight path in aviation is the three-dimensional trajectory of an aircraft, tracked in real-time with latitude, longitude, and altitude coordinates—sometimes ...

Nov 18, 2025 6 min read

Aviation Flight Operations +3

Glide Path

A comprehensive technical overview of the glide path in aviation, covering its definition, operational principles, guidance systems, regulatory classifications,...