Tolerance
Tolerance is a core concept in aviation and engineering, defining the allowable deviation in dimensions or properties of components. Proper tolerance selection ...
Out of Tolerance (OOT) occurs when a measurement or instrument exceeds its permissible limits, signaling nonconformance and requiring corrective action—vital for aviation safety and compliance.
Out of Tolerance (OOT) refers to a situation where a measurement, process, or instrument reading exceeds the established permissible deviation—known as a tolerance—set forth by regulations, manufacturers, or internal quality systems. In aviation, metrology, and other regulated sectors, tolerance defines the maximum allowable error or variation from a specified value. When values fall outside this range, the result is classified as out of tolerance, signaling a nonconformance and triggering corrective actions. Tolerance limits are determined based on safety, regulatory requirements, and functional necessities, and are often defined in technical manuals, maintenance procedures, or calibration certificates.
OOT is not limited to just the physical measurement of parts; it encompasses any data, signal, or reading that forms the basis of quality control, safety assurance, and regulatory compliance. For example, if a pressure transducer in an aircraft altimeter is specified to be accurate within ±20 feet and calibration reveals a deviation of 25 feet, the instrument is OOT. The implications for flight safety and airworthiness become critical, necessitating immediate investigation and rectification.
Understanding OOT, its detection, and its management is vital for professionals responsible for airworthiness, compliance, and quality assurance.
Tolerance is the allowable deviation from a nominal value, established to ensure functionality, safety, and compliance. It is typically expressed as a plus/minus range around a specified target, for example, 120.0 V ± 0.5 V for an electrical bus voltage. Tolerances are foundational in aviation, where system reliability and safety depend on precise adherence to standards.
Tolerance is foundational to system reliability—covering not only components but also processes and operational sequences, such as pitot-static system tolerances affecting altitude reporting.
Measurement accuracy describes how closely a measured value agrees with the true or reference value. In aviation, accuracy is paramount because even small deviations can cascade into significant risks. An instrument’s accuracy specification is a function of both systematic (bias) and random (precision) errors.
The relationship between accuracy and OOT is direct: if an instrument’s actual performance falls outside its specified accuracy, it is considered out of tolerance. Accuracy is verified during calibration, where the device under test is compared to a higher-level standard. Any deviation exceeding the allowed tolerance results in an OOT finding, necessitating corrective action.
Accuracy also influences calibration intervals: stable, accurate devices may be calibrated less frequently, while those prone to drift require shorter intervals.
Measurement uncertainty estimates the range within which the true value of a measurement lies, considering all error sources. In aviation, uncertainty quantification is critical for demonstrating compliance and making informed decisions about OOT conditions.
All calibration reports must include an estimate of measurement uncertainty, especially when results are close to tolerance limits. For example, a navigation system calibrated to ±0.5° with an as-found reading of 0.48° and an uncertainty of ±0.05° may still comply, depending on the applied decision rule.
Proper management of uncertainty prevents false OOT declarations and ensures safety margins are accurate.
A decision rule defines how measurement uncertainty is incorporated into the determination of conformity with tolerances. The main approaches:
Selecting a decision rule is a matter of risk management and regulatory compliance. In aviation, guard banding is widely used for safety-critical systems.
OOT conditions can arise from:
Identifying and addressing root causes is essential for preventing recurrence.
Key OOT detection methods include:
Best practice mandates thorough documentation of all OOT detection activities.
OOT conditions are classified by severity:
Severity classification supports risk-based response and resource allocation.
OOT events can:
Proper OOT management is both a compliance necessity and a business imperative.
Aviation OOT management typically includes:
Relevant standards and regulations:
Failure to comply can result in suspension of approvals or loss of certification.
A static pressure sensor in an air data computer is found 30 Pa above its ±20 Pa tolerance during scheduled calibration. All recent flights must be reviewed and the sensor corrected before returning to service.
A torque wrench used for engine mounts is found OOT, applying 5% less torque than specified. All affected engine installations are re-inspected and fasteners retorqued.
An FMS software update causes OOT errors in navigation performance. Investigation reveals a firmware bug causing miscalculation; the update is rolled back until corrected.
| Term | Definition | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerance | Permissible deviation from a specified value | ±20 Pa for static pressure sensor calibration |
| Out of Tolerance (OOT) | Measurement or instrument exceeds allowable tolerance | ADC reading 30 Pa off with ±20 Pa tolerance |
| Measurement Accuracy | Closeness to the true value | Altimeter with ±50 ft accuracy |
| Measurement Uncertainty | Quantified doubt about the measurement result | ±0.2% in pitot tube calibration |
| Decision Rule | Rule for incorporating uncertainty in pass/fail judgment | Guard banding in flight system calibration |
| Calibration Interval | Time/usage period between calibrations | 6 months for flight gyros |
| As-Found/As-Left Data | Instrument performance before/after calibration | Required for airworthiness records |
| Traceability | Linkage to national/international measurement standards | NIST-traceable calibration |
| Corrective Action | Steps to address and prevent recurrence of OOT | Recalibration and procedure updates |
| Regulatory Compliance | Adherence to aviation laws and standards | FAA, EASA, ICAO, ISO/IEC 17025, AS9100 |
Commercial Airlines: Regulatory authorities require airlines to document and manage all OOT events affecting flight-critical systems. Maintenance Control must assess the airworthiness impact of OOT findings and may have to ground aircraft, notify authorities, or perform fleet-wide inspections.
MROs (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul): MROs must demonstrate robust OOT management and traceability to retain approvals and contracts.
OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers): OOT data drives design improvements, warranty analysis, and customer support.
Private/General Aviation: While regulatory oversight may be lighter, best practices in OOT management still apply for safety and reliability.
Understanding and managing Out of Tolerance (OOT) is essential for aviation safety, compliance, and operational excellence. By adhering to international standards, leveraging best practices, and maintaining robust documentation, aviation organizations can minimize risk, ensure airworthiness, and foster a proactive safety culture.
For tailored solutions and to learn more about optimizing your OOT management processes, contact our experts or schedule a demo today.
Out of Tolerance (OOT) in aviation refers to any instrument, process, or measurement that falls outside its specified allowable range or tolerance. This signals a nonconformance, potentially impacting airworthiness and safety, and requires immediate investigation, documentation, and corrective action.
OOT is typically detected during scheduled calibrations, in-process checks, or ad hoc investigations using traceable standards. Deviations beyond the permissible range are recorded as OOT, triggering documentation and corrective procedures to ensure compliance and safety.
OOT findings can result in regulatory fines, aircraft grounding, safety risks, and increased operational costs. Critical OOT conditions may require immediate reporting to authorities, root cause analysis, re-inspection, and potentially the recall of affected aircraft or components.
OOT events should be managed systematically: assess impact, perform root cause analysis, implement corrective actions, review calibration intervals, document all findings, and ensure audit readiness. This approach supports compliance and minimizes operational risk.
Key standards include ISO/IEC 17025, FAA and EASA regulations, AS9100, and ICAO guidelines. These mandate rigorous OOT detection, traceability, measurement uncertainty reporting, and corrective action procedures for all aviation-related calibration and maintenance.
Discover how robust OOT management and calibration best practices can protect your fleet, ensure regulatory compliance, and strengthen safety culture.
Tolerance is a core concept in aviation and engineering, defining the allowable deviation in dimensions or properties of components. Proper tolerance selection ...
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) is the highest permissible weight an aircraft can have at the start of the takeoff roll, as certified by aviation authorities. Thi...
A comprehensive glossary of angular tolerance, enhanced with aviation, ICAO, ISO, and GD&T standards. Covers definitions, standards, measurement methods, aviati...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.