Final Approach

Instrument Procedures Approach Segments Flight Safety Aviation Regulations

Final Approach

The final approach is a pivotal phase in every instrument approach procedure (IAP), representing the last segment in which an aircraft transitions from instrument-guided navigation to visual landing cues. Extending from the Final Approach Fix (FAF) or Final Approach Point (FAP) to the Missed Approach Point (MAPt) or Decision Altitude/Height (DA/DH), this segment is the linchpin of safe, standardized, and efficient landings across global aviation.

Definition and Scope

The final approach segment starts:

  • At the FAF (for non-precision approaches), or
  • At the FAP (for precision/vertical guidance approaches),

and ends:

  • At the MAPt (non-precision), or
  • At the DA/DH (precision/vertical guidance).

During this phase, the aircraft must be stabilized—on course, at the correct speed, and in landing configuration. Descent is conducted to the published minimums:

  • Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) for non-precision
  • Decision Altitude/Height (DA/DH) for precision/vertical guidance

If the required visual references are acquired at minimums, landing is completed; otherwise, a missed approach is executed.

Segmentation of Instrument Approach Procedures

Instrument approaches are divided into up to five segments for clarity, obstacle clearance, and procedural order:

  1. Arrival Segment: (optional) Connects from en-route to initial approach.
  2. Initial Approach Segment: Begins at the Initial Approach Fix (IAF); aligns the aircraft for approach.
  3. Intermediate Segment: From Intermediate Fix (IF) to FAF/FAP; further aligns and configures for final.
  4. Final Approach Segment: From FAF/FAP to MAPt/DA/DH; descent to minimums and alignment with the runway.
  5. Missed Approach Segment: Executed if landing cannot be completed; ensures safe climb and navigation away from terrain and obstacles.

Each segment is carefully designed and published to guarantee safety, efficiency, and predictability in all weather conditions.

Structure and Types of Final Approach Segments

The structure of the final approach segment varies by approach type and navigation infrastructure:

Approach TypeEntry PointGuidanceDescription
Non-Precision Approach (NPA)FAFLateral onlyBegins at the FAF; descent to MDA; no vertical path provided.
NPA without FAFN/ALateral onlyNo defined FAF; descent begins when established on course.
Approach with Vertical GuidanceFAF/FAPLateral + VerticalUses LNAV/VNAV, LPV, etc.; both lateral and vertical path published and flown.
Precision Approach (ILS/GLS)FAPLateral + Precision VerticalBegins at glidepath intercept; descent along precise vertical path to DA/DH.

Example:

  • VOR Approach: FAF at a specific DME; descent to MDA.
  • ILS Approach: FAP at glidepath intercept; descent to DA.

Procedural Steps

Key procedural steps during the final approach:

  1. Crossing the FAF/FAP: Confirm inbound course, configure for landing (gear, flaps, speed), and begin descent as cleared and published.
  2. Descent and Alignment: Maintain precise lateral and vertical alignment, correcting for wind and monitoring instruments.
  3. Minimum Altitude: Level at MDA or DA/DH. Do not descend further unless visual cues are in sight and a safe landing can be assured.
  4. Visual Transition or Missed Approach: If visual references are acquired, transition to visual and land. If not, execute the missed approach without delay.

Regulatory Requirements and Minimums

Descent below minimums (MDA or DA/DH) is strictly regulated. Key requirements:

  • Aircraft must be in a position to land using normal maneuvers.
  • Flight visibility must meet or exceed that specified for the approach.
  • At least one required visual reference must be distinctly visible and identifiable (e.g., approach lighting, runway threshold, touchdown zone, runway markings or lights, VASI/PAPI).

Visual Descent Point (VDP): Published on many non-precision approaches, the VDP marks the point from which a normal descent from MDA may begin if visual references are available, encouraging a stabilized approach and reducing risks associated with “dive and drive” techniques.

Approach Lighting Systems and Visual Glideslope Indicators

Approach Lighting Systems (ALS):
Provide critical visual cues for transition from instruments to visual conditions.

SystemSupported CategoryFeatures
ALSF-1CAT IWhite bars, red terminating bars, sequenced flashers
ALSF-2CAT II/IIIExtended length, red side row bars, white bars, sequenced flashers
MALSRCAT IMedium-intensity, includes alignment indicator lights

Visual Glideslope Indicators:

  • VASI (Visual Approach Slope Indicator): Red/white bars indicating correct glidepath.
  • PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator): Four-unit system for more precise vertical guidance.

Both systems help pilots maintain correct descent angle and avoid terrain during the final phase.

Obstacle Clearance and Segment Protection

Obstacle clearance is foundational to final approach design. Airspace is protected laterally and vertically, with minimums based on detailed surveys and updated NOTAMs. For precision approaches, obstacle assessment is stricter due to the narrow, defined path; for non-precision, the protected area is larger.

Special approach types (circling, sidestep) have expanded or differently shaped protected areas.

Common Errors During Final Approach

  • Visual Illusions: Runway width/slope, featureless terrain (“black hole” effect), and atmospheric conditions can deceive pilots; instrument cross-check is essential.
  • Unstabilized Approach: Not meeting speed, configuration, or glidepath requirements increases risk of landing incidents.
  • Descending Below Minimums Without Visual Reference: A leading cause of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT); strictly prohibited.
  • Failure to Initiate Missed Approach: Continuing below minimums without required cues is hazardous; immediate action required.

Best Practices

  • Thorough Briefing: Review approach charts, minimums, NOTAMs, and weather.
  • Stabilized Approach Criteria: Ensure on path, correct speed, configuration by FAF/FAP.
  • Instrument and Visual Cross-Check: Rely on instruments, then transition to visual cues.
  • Strict Minimums Adherence: Never descend below MDA/DA/DH without required references.
  • Proactive Missed Approach Planning: Be prepared to execute a missed approach at minimums.
  • Mitigate Visual Illusions: Anticipate illusions and rely on instrument guidance.
  • Use VDP: If published, use as a guide to commence a stable visual descent.

Key Pilot Actions Table

StepAction
1Confirm inbound course and clearance
2Configure for landing: flaps, gear, speed
3Begin descent at FAF/FAP as published
4Monitor instruments and maintain stabilization
5Level at MDA or DA/DH until visual reference
6Continue to land if required cues are visible
7Execute missed approach at MAPt if cues lacking

Glossary of Key Terms

  • Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP): A published series of maneuvers for aircraft to transition from the en-route phase to landing using instruments.
  • Final Approach Fix (FAF): The designated fix for beginning final descent on a non-precision approach.
  • Final Approach Point (FAP): The point on a precision or APV approach where the glidepath/vertical path is intercepted.
  • Missed Approach Point (MAPt): The point where a missed approach must be initiated if landing cannot be assured.
  • Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA): The lowest altitude to which descent is authorized on a non-precision approach.
  • Decision Altitude/Height (DA/DH): The specified altitude/height on a precision/vertical guidance approach at which a missed approach must be initiated if required visual cues are not in sight.
  • Visual Descent Point (VDP): A defined point on the final approach course of a non-precision approach from which normal descent from the MDA to the runway should begin if visual reference is established.

The final approach segment represents the critical bridge between instrument navigation and a safe landing. Through strict adherence to procedures, regulatory minimums, and best practices, pilots ensure the highest levels of safety and reliability in every approach—regardless of weather, terrain, or airport complexity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the final approach in aviation?

The final approach is the last segment of an instrument approach procedure, extending from the Final Approach Fix (FAF) or Final Approach Point (FAP) to the Missed Approach Point (MAPt) or Decision Altitude/Height (DA/DH). During this segment, the aircraft is aligned with the runway and descends to the published minimums, preparing for landing or a missed approach if necessary.

How is the final approach segment initiated?

The final approach segment begins at the FAF (for non-precision approaches) or FAP (for precision and vertical guidance approaches), where the descent to minimums is commenced. The aircraft must be configured for landing, stabilized on the approach path, and cleared for approach before beginning descent.

What happens if the required visual references are not in sight during final approach?

If the pilot does not acquire the required visual references by the time the aircraft reaches the published minimums (MDA or DA/DH), a missed approach must be initiated immediately to ensure safety and obstacle clearance.

What are common errors during the final approach segment?

Common errors include unstabilized approaches, descending below minimums without visual cues, failing to initiate a missed approach, and misjudging altitude due to visual illusions. Adhering to published procedures and maintaining situational awareness are critical to avoid these errors.

What regulatory requirements govern the final approach?

Descent during the final approach is governed by regulations such as 14 CFR §91.175 in the US, which specify when a pilot may descend below minimums and what visual references must be in sight. International standards are set by ICAO and reflected in national regulations and approach procedures.

What is the difference between the Final Approach Fix (FAF) and the Final Approach Point (FAP)?

The FAF is a defined fix (often a navigation aid or DME distance) used in non-precision approaches, where the final descent begins. The FAP is used in precision and approaches with vertical guidance, representing the point where the glidepath or vertical path is intercepted and descent is initiated.

Enhance Safety and Precision in Final Approach

Discover how advanced approach procedures and pilot training ensure safe, stabilized landings in all conditions. Explore the latest in instrument approach technology and best practices.

Learn more

Final Approach Fix (FAF)

Final Approach Fix (FAF)

The Final Approach Fix (FAF) is a critical waypoint in instrument approach procedures, marking the start of the final approach segment. This glossary entry cove...

6 min read
Instrument Approach Aviation Glossary +2
Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) is a critical aviation term referring to the altitude on instrument approaches with vertical guidance at which a pilot must decide to con...

7 min read
Aviation Instrument Flying +2
Approach Angle

Approach Angle

The approach angle, also known as the vertical descent angle, glideslope angle, or descent angle, is the angle between an aircraft’s final approach path and the...

6 min read
Aviation Flight Procedures +3