CAT III (Category III) Precision Approach
CAT III (Category III) precision approach procedures allow aircraft to land safely in extremely poor visibility, with decision heights below 100 feet or even no...
CAT II precision approach allows aircraft to land in low-visibility conditions with decision heights between 100 and 200 feet and runway visual range of at least 300 meters. It requires specialized crew training, advanced avionics, and certified airport infrastructure, playing a key role in maintaining operational reliability in adverse weather.
A CAT II (Category II) precision approach is an advanced instrument landing procedure designed for aircraft operations in low-visibility conditions. Defined by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a CAT II approach provides both lateral and vertical guidance to the pilot, supporting safe landings when natural visual cues are insufficient. The hallmark of CAT II is a decision height (DH) lower than 200 feet but not lower than 100 feet above the runway threshold, combined with a runway visual range (RVR) of no less than 300 meters.
CAT II bridges the operational gap between basic CAT I approaches, which have higher minima and less demanding requirements, and the highly sophisticated CAT III procedures, which allow for landings in near-zero visibility. By enabling landings during periods of fog, heavy precipitation, or low cloud ceilings, CAT II approaches are vital for major commercial airports, cargo hubs, and business aviation operators seeking to maintain schedule reliability and minimize weather-related disruptions.
Successful CAT II operations depend on strict compliance with technical, operational, and regulatory standards. Both the aircraft and crew must be specifically certified, the airport must provide high-integrity navigation aids and lighting, and real-time RVR data must be available. This ensures that CAT II approaches are conducted safely, even in adverse meteorological conditions.
Precision approach categories are defined by the minimum DH and RVR permitted. The following table summarizes the key differences:
| Category | Decision Height (DH) | Runway Visual Range (RVR) |
|---|---|---|
| CAT I | ≥ 200 ft (60 m) | ≥ 550 m |
| CAT II | < 200 ft (60 m), ≥ 100 ft (30 m) | ≥ 300 m |
| CAT IIIA | < 100 ft (30 m) or none | ≥ 175 m |
| CAT IIIB | < 50 ft (15 m) or none | 50–175 m |
| CAT IIIC | No DH | No RVR limitation |
CAT II approaches require more advanced technology and pilot training than CAT I, but are less demanding than CAT III, which can allow landings even when no visual reference is available.
ICAO’s Annex 6 (Operation of Aircraft) and Annex 14 (Aerodromes) establish the global requirements for CAT II approaches, including:
These frameworks ensure that only qualified operators, trained crews, and properly equipped aircraft and airports conduct CAT II approaches.
To support CAT II operations, airports must be equipped with:
All systems must be continuously monitored and maintained, with immediate notification and suspension of CAT II operations if any critical system fails or degrades.
Aircraft authorized for CAT II approaches must have:
All equipment is subject to rigorous certification, regular functional checks, and prompt maintenance to ensure operational readiness.
Pilots must gain special CAT II authorization through:
Ongoing recurrent training and proficiency checks are mandatory to retain CAT II privileges.
Operators must submit to their regulatory authority:
Approval is only granted after thorough documentation and practical demonstration of safe CAT II operations, with continued oversight and periodic revalidation.
A CAT II approach involves:
These procedures, combined with equipment redundancy and rigorous crew training, minimize risks such as controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) and runway excursions.
| Feature | CAT I | CAT II | CAT III (A/B/C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Height (DH) | ≥ 200 ft | 100–200 ft | < 100 ft (A); < 50 ft (B); none (C) |
| Minimum RVR | ≥ 550 m | ≥ 300 m | 175 m (A); 50 m (B); none (C) |
| Radio Altimeter | Not required | Required | Required |
| Autopilot/Flight Director | Not required | Required | Required (higher redundancy) |
| Crew Authorization | Instrument rating | Additional CAT II | CAT III-specific |
| Equipment Redundancy | Standard IFR | Enhanced | Maximum redundancy |
| Typical Use Cases | Most airports | Major airports, low vis | Major airports, very low vis |
A CAT II (Category II) precision approach is a cornerstone of modern aviation, enabling safe, reliable landings in conditions that would otherwise preclude visual approaches. It requires a synergy of advanced airport infrastructure, certified aircraft equipment, and specially trained crews, all governed by stringent international and national regulations. As weather unpredictability and airport congestion increase, CAT II approaches play an ever more vital role in the efficiency and safety of global air transport.
For further reading, see related glossary entries on Instrument Landing System (ILS) , Runway Visual Range (RVR) , and Decision Height (DH) .
If you have additional questions or need support with CAT II implementation, contact our aviation experts or schedule a consultation .
The main differences lie in the decision height (DH) and runway visual range (RVR) required for each category. CAT I allows approaches down to 200 feet DH and 550 meters RVR, requiring only basic ILS and standard pilot qualifications. CAT II lowers the DH to between 100 and 200 feet and RVR to 300 meters, requiring enhanced equipment and crew training. CAT III allows for landings with even lower DH and RVR, in some cases permitting landings when visual reference is almost nonexistent, necessitating the most advanced systems and stringent operational controls.
Both the aircraft and the airport must be equipped with certified systems. On the ground, this includes a high-integrity Instrument Landing System (ILS), advanced runway lighting (such as touchdown zone, centerline, and approach lights), and real-time Runway Visual Range (RVR) measurement. In the aircraft, required systems include a CAT II-certified ILS receiver, radio altimeter, flight director or autopilot with approach coupling, redundant flight instruments, and warning/failure annunciations. All equipment must be regularly checked and maintained.
Pilots must complete specialized ground school, simulator, and in-aircraft training focused on CAT II procedures, human factors, and emergency scenarios. They must demonstrate proficiency in conducting CAT II approaches, including proper use of avionics and adherence to operational minima. Ongoing recurrent training and recent experience are required to maintain authorization.
Airports must install and maintain advanced ILS equipment, high-intensity lighting systems, and certified RVR measurement devices. The systems must meet ICAO and national authority standards for accuracy, redundancy, and fail-safety. Regular inspections, flight checks, and maintenance are required to ensure continued compliance, and any critical system failure results in suspension of CAT II operations until resolved.
If any critical equipment—either airborne or ground-based—fails during a CAT II approach, the crew must immediately discontinue the approach and execute a missed approach procedure. If the failure occurs before reaching decision height, the approach may be continued using higher (CAT I) minima if permitted and conditions allow, otherwise a diversion may be necessary.
Explore how CAT II precision approaches can increase reliability and safety for your airline or business aviation operations, even in challenging weather.
CAT III (Category III) precision approach procedures allow aircraft to land safely in extremely poor visibility, with decision heights below 100 feet or even no...
CAT I precision approach is an instrument landing operation using ground or satellite-based navigation aids, with a decision height not lower than 200 feet and ...
Approach category is a regulatory classification grouping aircraft by their reference landing speed at maximum certificated landing weight. It governs which ins...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.