
Pavement Distress Survey Methodology
A pavement distress survey systematically identifies, classifies, and measures each distress type, severity, and extent on a pavement section…
The scan finds the distress. The assessment is what turns thousands of located defects into a condition rating per section and a repair list in the order the money should be spent.

This service is bought by the person who has to answer two questions in the same meeting. What condition is the pavement in, and which sections get money this year. It fits an asset manager who already runs a pavement management system and needs a condition input that arrives in the same shape every year.
Three outcomes are what the service is judged on, and each has a state you can check on delivery rather than a promise you have to trust.
Every section you agreed to have assessed comes back with a Pavement Condition Index proxy on the 0 to 100 scale, the distress inventory the figure was computed from, and the section area it applies to.
Sections are ordered by condition and by the treatment band they fall into, so the list separates sections that still respond to preventive treatment from sections that have passed into rehabilitation.
Section boundaries, distress categories and positions are recorded so that the following assessment reports change rather than a fresh opinion.
Each deliverable with the party that owns it and the state it has to reach before the assessment is accepted.
The network split into branches and sections, with boundaries fixed before capture and reused on every later assessment.
Every detected distress with its type, severity band, extent and surveyed position on the surface.
A Pavement Condition Index proxy on the 0 to 100 scale with the distress densities that produced it.
Sections ordered by condition and treatment band, each with the distresses that drive its position.
On a repeat assessment, the rating movement per section and the distresses that grew, appeared or were repaired.
The section table and distress inventory in the format the receiving pavement management system reads.
Anything that reads as an immediate operational hazard, reported on the day of capture rather than with the assessment.
Tower coordination, escort where required, and the movement windows the capture is flown in.
Not included. The assessment says what condition the pavement is in, not what to build.
Not included. Bearing strength needs load testing or coring rather than a surface survey.
Not included. Continuous friction measuring equipment is a separate instrument and a separate visit.
You name the surfaces to assess and whether this is a first baseline or a repeat. We agree the section split, the export format and who signs off. Output is a scope note. If the section split cannot be agreed, the assessment does not start, because a rating against boundaries nobody accepts is worthless.
The capture is planned from the surface geometry and the camera optics, so ground resolution and overlap are computed rather than assumed. Output is a validated mission and a capture window request to your tower.
Flown between aircraft movements. About an hour on site per runway, with taxiways and aprons added in proportion to area. If weather closes the window, the mission is reflown unchanged rather than rebuilt.
Imagery goes through the surface analysis pipeline, which segments distress and classifies it by type and severity band. Detections below the confidence floor are held for human review rather than dropped silently.
Distress density is computed inside each agreed section and converted to a condition proxy on the 0 to 100 scale. Sections are then ordered by condition and treatment band.
The report, the inventory and the export land together, and we walk your engineer through the sections that moved. Anything disputed is re-examined against the retained imagery rather than re-flown.

The index reported here is a proxy. It comes from automated analysis of aerial imagery, and it is calibrated against ground-surveyed ASTM D6433 results so that its output tracks the standard method. It is not the standard method. ASTM D6433 asks a trained inspector to walk each sample unit, measure quantities by hand, read deduct values off published curves and run the corrected deduct value iteration. A camera flying overhead does none of that. What it does instead is see every square metre rather than a sample, at the same detection threshold everywhere, on every visit.
That trade is the whole argument. A manual survey is more authoritative on the sample units it covers and silent on the rest. An imaging assessment is weaker per unit and complete across the network, and it repeats. Where a funding programme or a reporting duty names the standard, the manual survey is still what satisfies it, and the two are not substitutes.
The distress families the assessment reports are the ones a surface image can carry: cracking in all its orientations, alligator cracking , raveling and weathering, potholes and patching, and joint distress including spalling and sealant loss. Loose material on the surface is reported as foreign object debris rather than as a pavement defect, because it is an operational finding with a different owner and a different clock.
Retained raw imagery is what makes a disputed rating checkable. If your engineer disagrees with a section figure, the frames that produced it are still there and the distress inventory can be re-examined against them. A number in a PDF with nothing behind it cannot be re-examined at all.
There is no published rate for this service and there is not going to be one, because the work scales with your pavement rather than with a line item, and a published figure would be wrong for most of the aerodromes that read it.
Three things can stop or degrade an assessment, and each has an owner.
Standing water, snow cover and heavy contamination hide the surface from a camera. The mission is reflown rather than rated through the obstruction. This is nobody's fault and it is the most common reason a date moves.
The capture needs tower coordination and, at most aerodromes, an escort. If the movement windows do not appear, the visit does not happen. That dependency sits with the aerodrome operator and it is worth confirming before travel is booked.
A rating is a statement about a defined area. If the section boundaries change between assessments, the time series breaks and the change report cannot be produced. We freeze the boundaries at scoping for exactly this reason, and changing them later is a decision with a cost rather than an edit.

A pavement distress survey systematically identifies, classifies, and measures each distress type, severity, and extent on a pavement section…

Drone and ground imagery turned into a defect map, a condition rating and a priority list for municipal roads, with a 3D model and a report in two…

What a drone pavement scan resolves on a runway, what it cannot, how ground sample distance sets the smallest measurable crack, and how a scan becomes…
Send the aerodrome, the surfaces you want assessed and whether a condition record already exists. That is enough to scope. You get a written scope note and a price back within two working days, and the scope note is not binding until you accept it.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.